
Justice Bhuyan Urges Rational Thinking to Defend Against Authoritarianism
TL;DR
- A Supreme Court judge warned that societies rejecting questions are vulnerable to authoritarianism.
- Scientific temper must move beyond labs to encourage rational thought among youth.
- Citizens should demand empirical evidence instead of relying on unverified claims.
- The constitutional concept of 'we' helps diversity coexist with unity.
Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan warned that communities which embrace claims lacking evidence and resist questioning become susceptible to authoritarian rule. Speaking at the University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya, he noted that failing to question tradition prevents reform and leaves populations exposed to false information.
The judge stressed that fostering a scientific temper, as outlined in the Constitution, must go beyond laboratory settings to build rational thinking among students and youth. He described this mindset as an inquiring attitude that relies on reason rather than accepting the first available explanation.
Justice Bhuyan also cautioned against divisive narratives that split society into opposing groups. He urged a return to the constitutional phrasing of 'We, the People of India,' noting that this concept allows unity and diversity to coexist without forcing uniformity.
Why It Matters
This report highlights foundational discussions on democratic values, scientific temper, and constitutional identity, offering broader significance for readers interested in legal perspectives on civil society, education, and public discourse.
Oct 31, 2026 · Updated 10/31/2026, 10:57:15 AM · Reported with: The Hindu
Sources (1)
NRI Bytes writes its own articles from the reporting below.
The Hindu — Society that accepts unverified claims and fears questions is vulnerable to authoritarianism: Justice BhuyanUp next · Politics
Kottayam Port Proposes New Inland Waterway Corridor to Vizhinjam
Read next →




